Almaty, Kazakhstan
ALMECORequest a consultation
ServicesALMECO DocsEngineering productsFree resourcesCredentialsAboutContactRequest a consultation
All services

Specialist services for decision-making

Public-private partnership advisory

We help public and private partners shape technically feasible, procurable and appropriately risk-allocated PPP projects.

Demo, packages and fee guidance

Service boundary

This service answers one specific management question.

Is PPP suitable, and how should requirements, procurement and risk allocation be structured?

Main output
PPP structure, output and service requirements, risk matrix and technical procurement content.
Do not confuse with
This structures the delivery model; it is not a general feasibility study, lender review or construction-management role.

Overview

Client benefits

What this engagement helps you protect, clarify or improve.

  • Connect public-service objectives with measurable technical and operational requirements.

  • Allocate project risks to the parties best placed to manage them.

  • Improve procurement readiness and dialogue with public authorities, investors and lenders.

Overview

Typical deliverables

The final scope is tailored to the decision, project stage and information available.

  • PPP suitability and delivery-options screening.

  • Technical feasibility and life-cycle requirements assessment.

  • Output specifications, performance standards and service-level framework.

  • Risk identification and allocation matrix.

  • Procurement strategy and technical evaluation criteria.

  • Technical inputs to the business case, stakeholder engagement and market-sounding materials.

Demo, packages and fee guidance

Review a sample output first, then select the required depth.

The Demo shows the output structure and quality using a wholly illustrative asset. Standard and Premium start only after input review and scope confirmation.

DEMO — sample output

Free

PDF · EN · 5 pages

Sample PPP technical screening

Model suitability, service requirements, risk allocation, KPIs and readiness gaps.

Best for
Assess the format, logic and practical value before appointment.
Typical timing
Immediate download after a short form
  • A separate version in the page language.
  • Illustrative and fictional data only.
  • No review of the visitor's asset and no professional opinion.

STANDARD — PPP Readiness Screen

Scope confirmed after a brief

individual quotation after a brief

Best for
Initial assessment of whether PPP fits the project and which evidence gaps remain.
Scope and timing
Typically 15–20 working days after data readiness
  • Suitability screen and stakeholder map.
  • Draft output and service-level requirements.
  • Initial lifecycle and risk-allocation logic.
  • Readiness gaps, roadmap and workshop.
Request package

PREMIUM — PPP Technical Structuring

Scope confirmed after a brief

individual quotation

Best for
Technical procurement content and a controlled allocation of lifecycle and performance risks.
Scope and timing
Against the project model and procurement programme
  • Technical structure, service KPIs and lifecycle requirements.
  • Risk matrix and interfaces with legal and financial advisers.
  • Technical tender sections and evaluation criteria.
  • Support for market sounding and agreed iterations.
Request package

A numeric fee without “from” applies to the stated package. “From” is a starting guide for the base scope shown in the card. Final scope, timing and fee are fixed in the proposal before work starts. Official charges, laboratories, surveys, external specialists and third-party services are included only when expressly stated.

Packages marked “Scope confirmed after a brief” are scoped individually: materially different assets should not be sold with one identical scope or timing commitment.

Overview

Typical use cases

Situations in which this service is commonly valuable.

  • A public authority assessing whether PPP is an appropriate delivery model.

  • A private partner evaluating a PPP opportunity or preparing a bid.

  • A project requiring restructuring because of affordability, performance or risk-allocation issues.